HOUSTON — (October 7, 2009) — Flu Central: Everything you need to know about H1N1 and seasonal flu is your one-stop location for the latest on influenza.
News
Update on H1N1 vaccine (video)
Q&A video addresses H1N1 vaccine
Fighting the flu: Follow fact not fiction
Incorporate preventative measures into everyday routine
Parents: Plan, prevent, protect – don’t panic – about flu
Pediatrician offers perspectives on H1N1, seasonal flu
Flu season reminders
Parents: Seasonal flu vaccination should be priority
Annual vaccinations can help prevent the flu in the long run
Video
Obstetrician talks about pregnant women, H1N1 vaccine
H1N1 Facts: Dr. Paul Glezen fields “swine” flu questions from Channel 39 viewers.
Seasonal and H1N1 vaccines: Dr. Carol Baker on Fox “Ask the Doctor” (courtesy MyFoxHouston.com)
Dr. Steve Rosenbaum of Baylor Clinic talks about hand sanitizer and how to take precautions against swine flu. (Video by Jason Witmer. Sept. 8, 2009, from chron.com)
For the media
Experts’ bios
Via news items and video, BCM experts offer tips on how to stay healthy, address the most common questions regarding seasonal flu, the H1N1 virus and the vaccine, and debunk myths and rumors.
It is important to note that the H1N1 is a new strain of influenza, and people of all ages are at risk for getting the virus. Some groups are at higher risk for complications, such as pregnant women, young children, the elderly and those with underlying health conditions. Except for infants under 6 months of age and a very few others who have specific issues, the H1N1 vaccine is recommended.
Baylor College of Medicine has one of eight federally funded Vaccine Treatment and Evaluation Units in the United States. These units have conducted tests on the H1N1 vaccine to determine appropriate dosage in adults, children and pregnant women.
Resources
Social media
Background
- Baylor College of Medicine continues H1N1 vaccine trials, Oct. 1, 2009
- H1N1 flu vaccine trial questions and answers, Aug. 11, 2009
- BCM experts respond to vaccination recommendations, July 30, 2009
- BCM to participate in U.S. H1N1 clinical trials, July 22, 2009
- Baylor studying flu vaccine in pregnant women, July 6, 2009
- BCM begins study of patients with H1N1 virus, May 29, 2009
- BCM flu experts answer H1N1 flu (swine flu) questions, April 27, 2009
Submit a Comment
View BCM’s privacy notices. If you wish to make a comment about this article, please use the form below. If you have a medical question, please make an appointment with a physician.
Your Name (required)
Your E-mail (required)
Your Message (required)
Comments
Continue Reading October 7th, 2009
HOUSTON — (October 6, 2009) — An experimental, under-the-skin injection used to correct dehydration in children brought to the emergency room was shown safe, effective and less painful than the standard intravenous therapy, in a study that appears in the current issue of the journal Pediatrics online today.
“When oral rehydration does not work, one of our only options is to administer fluids intravenously,” said Dr. Coburn Allen, assistant professor of pediatrics, in both the sections of emergency medicine and infectious diseases, at Baylor College of Medicine and the study’s lead author. “With young children, this is not easy because their veins are smaller and harder to find. This can be very painful for young children.”
Dehydration occurs after the child has had bouts of prolonged vomiting or diarrhea. When this happens, more fluids are lost than consumed.
“It can become very serious and require hospitalization,” said Allen.
Transmitting lost fluids
The experimental injection is aided by the enzyme hyaluronidase, a genetically-altered spreading agent that helps increase the body’s ability to transmit lost fluids back into its system.
In the study that took place in the Texas Children’s Hospital emergency room, doctors placed a catheter under the skin and injected a small amount of hyaluronidase, followed by an infusion of fluids for the next hour. This form of rehydration therapy was continued, as needed, for up to 72 hours.
Easy to perform procedure
The researchers found that 94.1 percent of 51 children were successfully hydrated and did not need an alternative form of rehydration. They said that 96 percent of the doctors who took part found the procedure easy to perform and 90 percent parents were satisfied or very satisfied.
Funding for this research came from Baxter Healthcare Corporation.
Other institutions involved in the study include Texas Children’s Hospital, St. John’s Mercy Children’s Hospital, St. Louis, MO, Children’s Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, Memorial Children’s Hospital, South Bend, IN, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, Phoenix Children’s Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, Connecticut Children’s Medical Center, Hartford, CT, Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, FL, Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY and Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Deerfield, IL.
Submit a Comment
View BCM’s privacy notices. If you wish to make a comment about this article, please use the form below. If you have a medical question, please make an appointment with a physician.
Your Name (required)
Your E-mail (required)
Your Message (required)
Comments
Continue Reading October 6th, 2009
Dipali Pathak
713-798-4710
pathak@bcm.edu
HOUSTON — (Oct. 5, 2009) — A cocaine vaccine that recruits the immune system to help block the drug’s euphoric effects proved effective in 38 percent of subjects who received the vaccine, said a Baylor College of Medicine researcher who led the study.
Q&A with Dr. Kosten
Video of Dr. Kosten answering questions is here. This content requires Javascript and the Adobe Flash Player. Get Flash
Text-only Q&A
A consortium of researchers began the work when principal investigator Dr. Thomas R. Kosten, a professor at BCM, was on faculty at Yale University School of Medicine. Kosten and his team evaluated the safety and effectiveness of a novel cocaine vaccine that has been more than 15 years in development. The report appears in the current issue of Archives of General Psychiatry.
Plans to improve cocaine vaccine
“The concept works,” said Kosten, “There are lots of ways to engineer it after that to make it work better.”
He plans to continue work to improve the vaccine and find better ways to bolster the immune system against the effects of cocaine.
Kosten holds the Jay H. Waggoner Endowed Chair in the Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at BCM. He is also the research director of the Veterans Affairs National Substance Use Disorders Quality Enhancement Research Initiative based at the Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Houston.
This study took place in one center, the Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System. Plans for a study of the vaccine in many sites are now under way.
Promising step
“The results of this study represent a promising step toward an effective medical treatment for cocaine addiction,” said Dr. Nora Volkow, director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse. “Provided that larger follow-up studies confirm its safety and efficacy, this vaccine would offer a valuable new approach to treating cocaine addiction, for which no FDA-approved medication is currently available.”
Kosten is quick to note that the vaccine is not a panacea, but the result shows that a vaccine can work in addictive disease, he said.
“The vaccine provokes the body to make antibodies. These antibodies bind to the cocaine, preventing it from leaving the bloodstream,” said Kosten.
The cocaine can be excreted in the liver or kidneys. An enzyme in the blood, cholinesterase, breaks down the cocaine. The fact that this enzyme continually breaks the drug down makes cocaine a better target for vaccines than other addictive drugs.
Effectiveness depends on level of antibody
In the study, 94 subjects who were on methadone were randomized to receive either the vaccine or an inactive medicine, a placebo. Neither they nor the physicians knew who received the vaccine until the study was over. Most subjects smoked crack cocaine. Over 12 weeks, the subject received five injections of either the vaccine or the placebo.
The vaccine’s effect depended on the level of antibody achieved. Those who reach high levels of antibodies are more likely to be able to stay cocaine-free.
“That’s the biggest problem with this vaccine. It is first generation and it does not create antibodies in everybody,” said Kosten. “Twenty-five percent of the people who get the vaccine do not make much antibody response.”
Relapse prevention medication
The vaccine can act as a preventive to relapse for those who want to stop taking the drug, Kosten said. It does not completely prevent cocaine cravings, but when the effect of the drug is blocked by the vaccine, people’s cravings will diminish.
“This is a relapse prevention medication. If you take cocaine, you won’t feel anything,” he said.
Others who took part in this research include Drs. Bridget A. Martell and James Poling and registered nurse Ellen Mitchell of Yale University School of Medicine and the Veterans Affairs Connecticut Hospital; and Drs. Frank M. Orson, Roger D. Rossen and Tracie Gardner of Baylor College of Medicine and the Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Houston.
Funding for this study came from the National Institute of Drug Abuse, the Veterans Affairs Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinic Center in New England, the Veterans Affairs Office of Research and Development/Cooperative Studies Program Career Development Award. Celtic Pharmaceuticals provided vaccine and paid travel fees for consultative services as well as providing a small amount of administrative funds for design and conduct of the study.
Was this article helpful? .
Continue Reading October 5th, 2009
HOUSTON — (October 2, 2009) — Finding a treatment for a deadly type of skin cancer could be closer now that Merkel cells are found to originate from the skin, say researchers from Baylor College of Medicine in Houston and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine in Cleveland, in a report that appears in the journal Developmental Biology.
In hairy skin, Merkel cell-neurite complexes cluster together and form touch domes. As shown in schematic, a sensory neuron (purple) contacts a cluster of mouse Merkel cells (green) in the skin at the epidermal-dermal interface.
“Our previous study showed direct evidence that Merkel cells are essential for detecting light touch,” said Dr. Ellen Lumpkin, assistant professor of neuroscience, molecular physiology and biophysics and molecular and human genetics at BCM. “Our latest finding shows us more characteristics of these cells that will have implications in not only neuroscience research, but also dermatology since Merkel cells give rise to Merkel cell carcinoma.”
Knowledge of origin helpful
Since the cell’s first description in 1875, researchers have speculated whether they derived from skin cells or neural crest cells. Neural crest cells form, among other structures, most of the peripheral nervous system.
“Merkel cells have characteristics that make them more akin to neural crest cells, such as appearance and proteins they express,” said Dr. Stephen Maricich, assistant professor of pediatrics, neurosciences and otolaryngology at CWRU SOM. “Not knowing exactly how they developed made treating Merkel cell carcinoma and other skin problems difficult.” Merkel cells may be involved in other skin conditions such as psoriasis, added Maricich.
Knocking out Atho1
Mice were injected with FM1-43, a fluorescent dye which labels sensory cells and neurons, 24 hr before imaging the touch domes. In wild-type mice (A), both the Merkel cells (triangle arrow heads) and the sensory nerve fiber (arrows) are visible. In the mice where Atoh1 has been deleted (B), no cells resembling Merkel cells are seen, confirming these mice lack Merkel cells. The nerve fiber is present and hyper-innervates the vacant touch dome. These data support epidermal origin of Merkel cells.
Using genetically-engineered mouse lines, researchers were able to delete Atoh 1, a gene essential to the formation of Merkel cells. When this was done in the neural crest, Merkel cells still developed. However, when this same process was completed in the skin, Merkel cells did not develop.
“Knocking out Atoh 1 in the neural crest line caused other problems despite Merkel cells being present. However, when Atoh 1 was knocked out in skin cells, only Merkel cells were missing with no other issues,” said Maricich, who is lead author on the study. “This showed us that we had specifically targeted the Merkel cells and that Atoh 1 in skin cells was necessary to their development.”
Fate mapping
Immunostaining using Merkel-cell specific markers confirms Merkel cell loss in Atoh1 conditional knockout mice. As seen in the top panel, wild-type touch domes contain Merkel cells (Keratin8, green) and sensory nerve fibers (Neurofilament-200, red). In the bottom panel, Atoh1 conditional knockout touch domes have no Keratin-8 staining, confirming Merkel cell absence. However, as seen in the FM images, the nerve (red) hyper-innervates the vacant touch dome.
Researchers also fate mapped the cells, which supported their initial findings. Fate mapping is a technique used to trace the developmental fate of an embryo, showing which tissues the cells in each region will give rise to.
“The techniques used in this study will help neuroscientists to further explore the function of Merkel cells, including the behavioral consequences when only Merkel cells have been deleted,” said Lumpkin, a study co-author.
Another aspect of future research, said Lumpkin, is understanding how these touch receptors affect the development of the brain.
Funding for this study came from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases.
Other researchers who contributed to this study include Dr. George R. Miesegaes, department of molecular and human genetics at BCM, now with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research; and Kristin M. Morrison, department of pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University.
For more information on basic science research at Baylor College of Medicine, please go to www.bcm.edu/fromthelab or www.bcm.edu/news.
Images courtesy Aislyn Nelson and Dr. Ellen Lumpkin.
Submit a Comment
View BCM’s privacy notices. If you wish to make a comment about this article, please use the form below. If you have a medical question, please make an appointment with a physician.
Your Name (required)
Your E-mail (required)
Your Message (required)
Comments
Continue Reading October 2nd, 2009
HOUSTON — (September 30, 2009) — In the seemingly simple world of the social amoeba, some cheat, giving advantage to their genetic kin. Why, then, do they not take over the population?
One possibility, said collaborating researchers from Baylor College of Medicine and Rice University, are mutations that confer the ability to resist cheaters. They describe this population in a report that goes online today in the journal Nature.
“These resistant strains are ‘noble’ in that they do not take advantage of the other strains,” said Anupama Khare, a graduate student in the laboratory of Dr. Gad Shaulsky at BCM and the paper’s first author. “In fact, they even reduce the cheater’s ability to cheat such strains.”
The paper is the latest chapter in the story of the Dictyostelium discoideum or social amoeba that is being unraveled in the laboratories of Shaulsky, professor of molecular and human genetics at BCM, Dr. Adam Kuspa, chair of biochemistry and molecular biology at BCM and Dr. Joan E. Strassmann and Dr. David C. Queller, professors in the department of ecology and evolutionary biology at Rice University.
Stalks and spores
Social amoebae live as single-cell organisms in normal times. When starved, they form multi-cellular organisms made up of stalks and spores. At one point in this process, some of the cells “sacrifice” themselves and become the dead stalks that support a body of spores, made up of living cells that keep the population alive. This population can be genetically diverse, and a roughly equal proportion of cells from the different gene pools sacrifice themselves to become stalks. That means that the different gene types survive in equal proportions.
Yet some amoeba “cheat” and as a result, more of that particular genotype survives. If this strategy always worked, these “cheaters” would take over the population.
Cheater resistant
To test their hypothesis that some amoebas are cheater resistant, the researchers mixed a population of mutated cells with a cheater strain and allowed them to develop into stalks and spores as chimeras. They thought that the cheater cells would exploit most of the cells in the mutant population, and that a high proportion of any cells left would be resistant to cheating. After several generations, their hypothesis proved true. Further studies showed that these “noble” social amoebae not only resisted the cheaters, they also did not themselves cheat on other amoebae.
“In this study Anu has demonstrated so clearly and cleanly such a response to cheaters at the molecular level. It is also very interesting that these resisters are noble, in the sense that they themselves do not exploit their ancestor,” said Strassmann.
“The active cheating in social amobae is more similar to animal sociality, and is therefore a good model system for exploring the complex evolutionary dynamics of genes affecting cooperation, cheating and cheater-resistance,” the authors wrote.
“The ones we identified don’t abolish cheating completely,” said Khare.
“Think of them as the firebreaks that prevent the flames from spreading,” said Shaulsky. “Or they are like the people resistant or vaccinated against the flu that prevent it from spreading.”
Lorenzo Santorelli of both BCM and Rice also took part in this work.
Funding for this research came from the National Science Foundation and the Cullen Foundation.
Submit a Comment
View BCM’s privacy notices. If you wish to make a comment about this article, please use the form below. If you have a medical question, please make an appointment with a physician.
Your Name (required)
Your E-mail (required)
Your Message (required)
Comments
Continue Reading September 30th, 2009
Next Posts
Previous Posts